bookmark_borderOct 13

Reference links:

Old Testament

I have not been tracking the chronological ordering (or rather, lack thereof) in Jeremiah, but today we have a what seems like a jump back in time. We have gone from the imminent doom of Jerusalem to Jeremiah giving what are, for him, reasonably friendly warnings to the king.

This is what the Lord says: Be fair-minded and just. Do what is right! Help those who have been robbed; rescue them from their oppressors. Quit your evil deeds! Do not mistreat foreigners, orphans, and widows. Stop murdering the innocent! If you obey me, there will always be a descendant of David sitting on the throne here in Jerusalem. The king will ride through the palace gates in chariots and on horses, with his parade of attendants and subjects. But if you refuse to pay attention to this warning, I swear by my own name, says the Lord, that this palace will become a pile of rubble.

Then we seem to jump forward again with messages about Jehoahaz and Jehoiakim. Quick review. Jerhoahaz was the king taken to Egypt and replaced with essentially a puppet king, his brother Jehoiakim. Although Judah had not been completely destroyed at this point, its kings were pretty much powerless. This makes it seems like Jeremiah’s warning above to an earlier king or, at latest, Jehoahaz before he was deposed. On the other hand, the repeated references to the palace do thematically link the opening warning and the message to Jehoiakim.

In any case, the picture is pretty grim for Jehoiakim. Jeremiah most emphatically does not think he will come to any good. After that, the Lord sends message to Jehoiakim that he will an unmourned death. We then read prophecies again Jehoiakim’s son Jehoiachin. He does not fare much better in the eyes of the Lord. He’ll die in exile.

Jeremiah then prophecies eventual restoration and lasting safety of his people. Those are most certainly unfulfilled prophecies. Even for those who consider Jesus to be the “Righteous Descendant”, there is certainly some delay in the implementation of this plan:

But I will gather together the remnant of my flock from the countries where I have driven them. I will bring them back to their own sheepfold, and they will be fruitful and increase in number. Then I will appoint responsible shepherds who will care for them, and they will never be afraid again. Not a single one will be lost or missing.

Also, Jeremiah doesn’t like false prophets because they encourage evil. People should not listen to them.

New Testament

New book! I must admit that just from today’s reading, I could go either way on Pauline authorship. That said, the bit in the middle gave me pause:

He will come with his mighty angels, in flaming fire, bringing judgment on those who don’t know God and on those who refuse to obey the Good News of our Lord Jesus. They will be punished with eternal destruction, forever separated from the Lord and from his glorious power. When he comes on that day, he will receive glory from his holy people—praise from all who believe.

Mighty angels and flaming fire do note seem like standard Paul, and generally thus far Paul has talked about praise given to God, not Jesus (or human praise, but that is generally in a negative context).

Other than that, greetings, thankfulness for the growing faith of the church, and prayers to them all seem typically Pauline.

So now let’s see what Understanding The Bible has to say:

Although repeating themes from 1 Thessalonians, 2 Thessalonians  reinterprets Paul’s original eschatology, asserting that a number of traditional apocalyptic “signs” much precede the eschaton. 

Many scholars question Paul’s authorship  of 2 Thessalonians. If Paul composed it, why does he repeat — almost verbatim — so much of what he had just written to the same recipients? More seriously, why does the author present an eschatology so different from that given in the first letter? In 1 Thessalonians, the Parousia will occur stealthily, “like a thief in the night.” In 2 Thessalonians, a number of apocalyptic “signs” will first advertise its arrival. The interposing of these mysterious events between the writer’s time and that of the Parousia has the effect of projecting the eschaton further into the future — a contrast to 1 Thessalonians, in which the end is extremely close. 

Scholars defending Pauline authorship advance several theories to explain the writer’s apparent change of attitude toward the Parousia. In the first letter, Paul emphasizes the tension between the shortness of time the world has left and the necessity of believers’ vigilance and ethical purity as they await Christ’s return. In the second missive, Paul writes to correct the Thessalonians’ misconceptions of his earlier emphasis on the nearness of end time.

… Paul rarely predicts specific events in the course of future history, particularly in the vague and cryptic style of 2 Thessalonians.

2 Thessalonians contains a warning that forged letters were already circulating in Paul’s name and ends by insisting that Paul verified his genuine letters with his own signature. Scholars doubting Pauline authorship view the pseudonymous writer as protesting overmuch, but the apostle appends similar comments to undisputed letters. 

The Wikipedia article has more details.

So it sounds like we’re in for vague, not typically apocalyptic warnings in a letter that may or may not be genuinely Pauline.

Psalms and Proverbs

All of today’s proverbs are rather poetic:

Timely advice is lovely,
like golden apples in a silver basket.

To one who listens, valid criticism
is like a gold earring or other gold jewelry.

Trustworthy messengers refresh like snow in summer.
They revive the spirit of their employer.

A person who promises a gift but doesn’t give it
is like clouds and wind that bring no rain.

bookmark_borderOct 12

Reference links:

Old Testament

Jeremiah pulls another stunt, this time with a clay jar which he breaks to signify Jerusalem’s impending doom. More interesting is the setting of this event. Jeremiah makes his point in the valley of Ben-Hinnom. There he conveys these words from the Lord,

For Israel has forsaken me and turned this valley into a place of wickedness. The people burn incense to foreign gods—idols never before acknowledged by this generation, by their ancestors, or by the kings of Judah. And they have filled this place with the blood of innocent children. They have built pagan shrines to Baal, and there they burn their sons as sacrifices to Baal. I have never commanded such a horrible deed; it never even crossed my mind to command such a thing!

First off, just to get it out of the way: child sacrifice is terrible. I am glad that Jeremiah and his vision of God are against it. But that’s not why this passage interests me.

I am much more interested in the question of why Judah is turning to these idols (a subject that, sadly, the Biblical authors do not seem to actually address). Although people are far from rational about religion (especially when evaluating its likely truth), they do tend to be rational in so far as their choice to pursue some particular religion or religious act corresponds to some real need.

Throughout the Bible, we have seen God’s chosen people turning to idols. This, to me, indicates that Yahweh was not adequate to fulfill the needs of the people. So why was it that, again and again, the cult of Yahweh was unable to meet the needs of the people (‘cult’ in the technical sense)?

I don’t know, but what I do know is that after the destruction of Jerusalem by the Babylonians, Jewish faith changed dramatically. Perhaps when they were separated from their traditional shrines for Yahweh and for other gods and goddesses, the Jewish people were able to synthesize the disparate ideas into one coherent God (and then bring themselves to think that Yahweh fulfilled all these needs the full time). Without the constraints of physical places of worship, the ideas associated with different shrines were able to flow into each other.

Also, Jeremiah hates his life and Jerusalem is totally going to be destroyed.

New Testament

We end 1 Thessalonians today. A little bit of advice. A little bit of encouragement. Nothing we haven’t seen in the other Pauline letters.

Psalms and Proverbs

Avoid rushing to court. Don’t share secrets even in anger.

bookmark_borderOct 11

Reference links:

Old Testament

The Lord’s declarations of punishment alternate with Jeremiah’s declarations of his confidence and trust in the Lord. Jeremiah insists that the people of Jerusalem observe the sabbath. The Lord instructs Jeremiah to use a potter an example of God’s ability to destroy. This includes a declaration that all God’s promises are conditional.

If I announce that a certain nation or kingdom is to be uprooted, torn down, and destroyed, but then that nation renounces its evil ways, I will not destroy it as I had planned. And if I announce that I will plant and build up a certain nation or kingdom, but then that nation turns to evil and refuses to obey me, I will not bless it as I said I would.

The reading ends after Jeremiah hears he is being plotted against and turns vengefully upon the people he had been trying to get God to save. Somehow, it is not surprising that both Jeremiah and the words he attributes to God share a desire for vengeance and violence.

New Testament

Stay away from sexual sin. Love each other even more than you do already. Live a quiet life and mind your own business (I wish more attention was paid to that one).

After that, we get a brief aside about whether or not dead believers will be resurrected when Jesus returns. Paul says they will. Paul also says something that some take to be further support for the view that he believed Jesus would return in his lifetime:

We tell you this directly from the Lord: We who are still living when the Lord returns will not meet him ahead of those who have died.

This verse by itself is pretty ambiguous, but it does lend support to other verses which imply that Paul believed Jesus would return soon.

Psalms and Proverbs

Come on One Year Bible! You’ve been pretty good so far with the divisions. Yeah, sometimes you divide in the middle of a topic, but usually the divisions are pretty reasonable. Which brings us to today’s reading from Proverbs:

Don’t demand an audience with the king
or push for a place among the great.
It’s better to wait for an invitation to the head table
than to be sent away in public disgrace.

Just because you’ve seen something,

Dividing a reading in the middle of a sentence? Come on! I mean, I know you weren’t the ones to divide the verse in the middle of a sentence, but you could have at least grouped the two verses together.

bookmark_borderOct 10

Reference links:

Old Testament

We’ll keep this quick since I have caught my husband’s cold.

The dialog Jeremiah sets up between himself and God is an interesting one. In this conversation, Jeremiah is the merciful one; he wants to pray for the people to be spared, but God will not let him. God, on the other hand, is bent on punishing the people.

Off the top of my head, I can think of two reasons for this. The obvious and boring one is that Jeremiah wants to defend himself against his attackers. He wants to be able to say something like, “I did all I can; I want to save you all, but God won’t listen.” The more interesting reason I have thought of is that this is a literary device. Each time Jeremiah asks for God to spare the Judah, God can emphasize the degree to which Judah has failed him. Essentially, the dialog between Jeremiah and God acts as a frame for the explanation of Judah’s sins.

In any case, after some more back and forth about the coming doom and gloom (including a pronouncement that Jeremiah should not get married or have children since they will just suffer), there is a bit of hope. The exiled, punished people will someday be brought home again.

New Testament

1 Thessalonians continues to be very personal. Paul talks about the persecution of the believers and his inability to visit them.

Psalms and Proverbs

Today we get some insight about the likely authenticity of these so called proverbs of Solomon:

These are more proverbs of Solomon, collected by the advisers of King Hezekiah of Judah.

Remember that, if we take the Biblical record of kings somewhat seriously, there was something like a couple hundred years (or more?) between Solomon and Hezekiah. Given that period of time, it seems unlikely that all, or even most, of these proverbs are authentic. Instead, it seems more likely that statements of wisdom were attributed to Solomon over the years because he had a reputation for wisdom.

Also, amusingly, all of the proverbs today are about the awesomeness of the king. If this actually was the kind of wisdom Solomon was sharing, it was rather self serving.

bookmark_borderArchitect Pre-meeting

As part of the land purchase process, we had an introductory meeting with the architect who will be working on the project.  The purpose was to get a feel for what a house might look like that fulfills our program, on this piece of land.  I call this a “pre-meeting” since at that point we had not officially purchased the land, or signed a contract to work with anyone on this project.

The architect YS Development has hired for all of the Bellevue 41st project is Markus from Whitney Architecture.  We spent about two hours with him going over a proposed design for our house.

The lay of the land and orientation towards the street pretty much fixes the garage to the east with entrance from that direction; but the front door to the house on the south east corner (well, the front door could be moved around, but it doesn’t look like there are many other good locations for it).  The advantage to this is that for guests, the front door from the street will kind of by-pass the garage, so our house should be more inviting, instead of having a big garage door greet you, with the entrance tucked off to the side.

With the land sloping down from the east side to the west, we’re probably going to go with the main floor on the same level as the front door and garage, a second floor with bedrooms above that, and then a partial floor below the main floor on the west side (probably just one larger room).  This bottom floor won’t be a basement, since it will be at ground level on the west side, and probably tucked into the hill only a little bit.

The exact layout, size, and orientation of the rooms will certainly change throughout the process; but we had a really good discussion, and I think a lot of good ideas were brought up.  Markus was very willing to let us throw around ideas, and talk about what we liked and didn’t like about this design.  Overall, the meeting was really good, and talking with Markus was awesome — we’re very excited to be working with him.

bookmark_borderOct 9

Reference links:

Old Testament

Just one minute! I thought we were reading Jeremiah, not Job. Jeremiah brings his case before God to ask why the wicked prosper. However, God’s answer is quite different than in Job. In Job, the answer to this question was “I am totally awesome and powerful, and you just don’t get it.” In Jeremiah, God’s answer to the question is that he has abandoned his people.

The result of all this is that Judah and its neighbors will all be destroyed, but they will be restored if they turn to the Lord.

After that God takes Jeremiah through a rather exercise. God tells Jeremiah to buy a loin cloth, wear it, and bury it. Later, God tells Jeremiah to dig the loin cloth up. To no one’s surprise, it is decaying and useless. The point of this exercise is to show how God will rot away the pride of Judah. In that discussion, we get this… interesting bit of imagery:

As a loincloth clings to a man’s waist, so I created Judah and Israel to cling to me, says the Lord.

After that we read more fairly standard ranting.

New Testament

New letter! Let’s see what Understanding The Bible has to say about it:

1 Thessalonians is Paul’s earliest surviving letter and thus the oldest Christian document in existence. Written from Corinth about 50 CE to a church that Paul, with his companions Timothy and Silas (Silvanus), had recently founded, it is remarkable chiefly for its eschatology, particularly the urgent expectation of Christ’s Parousia and the resurrection of the dead.

… 1 Thessalonians is remarkable in showing how quickly essential Christian ideas had developed and how thoroughly apocalyptic Paul’s message was. Referring to the Parousia in now fewer than six different passages, at least once in each of the letter’s five brief chapters, Paul makes the imminence of Jesus’ return his central message. 

Harris comments that this letter also contains a good dose of Paul’s standard self-justification of his authority even though he seems to have a friendly relationship with the Thessalonian church.

The Wikipedia article notes that some people consider some passages in the letter to be interpolations by later authors.

On to today’s content! Greetings are followed by praise for the believers in Thessalonia. Their faith in the face of hardship has earned them quite the reputation amongst believers in the region. Paul then recalls his visit and the way he and his companions lived while there. Amongst other things, we learn that they had not been treated well at Philippi and they worked to earn their keep while in Thessalonia.

Psalms and Proverbs

Today’s proverbs talk about the evils of laziness. The message culminates in the lines,

A little extra sleep, a little more slumber,
a little folding of the hands to rest—
then poverty will pounce on you like a bandit;
scarcity will attack you like an armed robber.

These lines show the difference between an agrarian economy and a modern economy. While it is certainly true that laziness can bring ruin in a modern economy, we have come into a world where it is much easier to overwork. As a farmer, the amount you could work was limited by the seasons and by the available light. Yes, you might have to work as hard as you possibly could during the times you could work, but there were times when you could not work at all.

Applying this advice to a modern worker, however, could be disastrous. These days, it is possible to work to the point where you destroy your health, well being, and relationships with others. Both the nature of the work and modern conveniences such as electricity make this possible. In that setting, taking this advice too much to heart would be damaging and unhealthy.

bookmark_borderLand: Acquired

As of last Wednesday, September 29th, we officially own the land in Bellevue for our house.  This is the first full commitment to the project, but also means that the whole process and timeline is now a go.  We will be starting design very shortly (as soon as we recover from various bouts of busy and sickness over this past weekend), and spend the next few months on that.

The land acquisition ended up being a bit quicker than we thought.  The lot was owned by the bank, so we would be negotiating with them on the price, and doing the actual purchase from them.  We informed Yuval of our decision on the Bellevue 41st project, and he told us he would work on our land purchase in about a week and a half, after he had finished closing a transaction on another lot in that same project.  However, less than a week later, I got a call Monday after lunch from Yuval that someone else had put in a bid for that parcel!  This would have a couple of potential problems: obviously it would put our project back into limbo; but as this was someone not involved with YS Development, a one-off house along with the other four houses from the Bellevue 41st project could throw off the continuity of the community there.  So we had to get an offer submitted ASAP that could beat this other offer.

We met with Yuval that evening, and he had an offer prepared to submit to the bank next morning.  It was for an even $200,000, which was $25k-50k above what we hoped to be able to negotiate down to; but we felt this should be enough for the bank to accept a competing offer; and while it was at the same price as the other offer, we had the advantage that our offer was all cash (therefore a quicker process not dependent on getting financing), and did not have any brokers or agents involved (avoiding the extra commission the bank would have to pay out of the proceeds).  Unfortunately, this did bump up the overall price to around $730,000.  While not great, this project still offered the best timeline; and a 4% increase is not terrible.  Since we’ve been waiting around 9-10 months, we decided that with the extra savings we’ve accumulated in that time, we could cover the increase, so we decided to go ahead with the offer.

Late the next morning we heard that the bank had accepted our offer; so in under 24 hours we had gone from biding our time, to having a pending purchase in place!  The offer was set up to give us about 10 days to cancel if we decided the lot really wasn’t feasible for us; and a few more days beyond that as a buffer so that we could maintain a closing date before the end of the month.  Since YS Development had already planned on using this parcel, a lot of the work for assessing building, permitting, etc. feasibility had already been done; so it was mostly a matter of verifying that it would work for us in particular.

The first piece of this was an initial meeting with the architect to get an idea of what our house might look like.  I’ll cover this in more detail soon, but the short of it is that we got a good feeling for how the land would constrain our design, but also showed us the possibilities that it offered.

The next piece was to make sure everything else was in order.  For the legal part, we used a benefit from Google which is (essentially) a subscription legal service, where we pay a fixed amount every month, but can use the service at any time to have a lawyer take care of standard things, such as reviewing real estate documents.  A few good points were identified, and prompted us to get a title report in enough time to have it reviewed, too. There ended up being quite a few things on the title report; which isn’t entirely unexpected, given that this is a recently-subdivided part of a lot in Bellevue proper which has been privately owned but not yet built on since sometime in the 1960s or so.  Along with all the expected utility easements, there were also claims for a road (which has since been built and is the main access to the parcel) and similar.  But nothing was objectionable, and the review pointed out a few items that weren’t relevant anymore and could be cleared.

On Monday the 27th, two days before the scheduled closing, we gave the go-ahead for the purchase.  We were going through Chicago Title for the title insurance and escrow/closing, since Yuval had worked with them and knew they were good.  We got a closing statement and wire instructions that day, and the next morning we sent a wire transfer from our bank to the escrow account.  Then Tuesday afternoon we went in-person to sign the documents for our part of the closing.  On Wednesday the 29th, the bank completed their part of the transaction, and the land was officially transferred to us.

This was our first ever real estate transaction, and overall went relatively smoothly.  It was fairly quick; luckily most of the hard work was done by others, especially YS Development. I probably learned the most from the lawyer’s comments — while in some ways they felt like extra complications, they did help to point out issues we weren’t really clear on, and helped to clarify some vague points.  We also learned that in a cash transaction, the amount of documents to sign is actually pretty small (apparently that changes completely if you have financing involved); the purchase offer to the bank was a half-dozen pages (one of which we signed and the rest we initialed), the title policy was maybe 10-20 pages total (but none that we had to sign), the closing statement and documents were about 15 pages, of which we signed seven.  The only large part was the supporting documentation for the title report, which was over 100 pages; but that was all copies of county and city documents and I certainly didn’t read through it all.

Now that we own the land, we do have a bit of recurring expenses for it: taxes and utilities. Since it is bare property, the taxes are not too bad; about $1600 for the whole year (this will obviously go up a lot once we have a house on it).  For utilities, the city bills for storm drainage for all land, though the bills should be small since the land is undeveloped (0% impervious coverage).

I will admit that the financial and business transaction parts of this process are not my favorite.  I’m glad that this portion has been successfully resolved; and now we can focus on the more enjoyable design process for the next few months.

bookmark_borderOct 8

Reference links:

Old Testament

Much of today’s reading consists of a rant against idols. It makes me wonder, how would Jeremiah respond to a world where three major world religions (including his) do not worship images of their Lord (well, Christianity is questionable on that point). Would he find some other equally straw man way to dismiss the claims of Christianity and Islam? Or does he really believe that it is the worship of idols which makes the other religions of his time so obviously false?

Jeremiah, like most of the Biblical authors, clearly misunderstands what idols stood for (they were understood to be symbols of the gods they represented, not the gods themselves). However, he could at least claim that his religion was unique amongst those he was familiar with in not worshiping an image of their God. Modern religions are on much more equal footing when it comes to their claims. (And that, in my opinion, weakens the claims of all of them.)

New Testament

Today we get the Colossians version of the passages on submission. This version has less detail, so it’s easy to see why this isn’t the version that’s commonly quoted.

Whoever divided the New Testament books into chapters choose an odd place to put the split between chapters 3 and 4 of Colossians. The split occurs just after slaves are admonished to obey their masters. The first verse of chapter 4 tells masters to treat their slaves well. This clearly goes with the previous material.

After that, Paul gives some encouragement and then closes the letter. Tomorrow, a new letter!

Psalms and Proverbs

Some good advice:

Don’t testify against your neighbors without cause;
don’t lie about them.
And don’t say, “Now I can pay them back for what they’ve done to me!
I’ll get even with them!”

bookmark_borderOct 7

Reference links:

Old Testament

Today I want to focus on the end of the reading:

This is what the Lord says:
“Don’t let the wise boast in their wisdom,
or the powerful boast in their power,
or the rich boast in their riches.
But those who wish to boast
should boast in this alone:
that they truly know me and understand that I am the Lord
who demonstrates unfailing love
and who brings justice and righteousness to the earth,
and that I delight in these things.
I, the Lord, have spoken!

“A time is coming,” says the Lord, “when I will punish all those who are circumcised in body but not in spirit—the Egyptians, Edomites, Ammonites, Moabites, the people who live in the desert in remote places, and yes, even the people of Judah. And like all these pagan nations, the people of Israel also have uncircumcised hearts.”

I believe we may have found another one of those passages which deeply influenced Paul. Paul uses both the idea of boasting only in one’s knowledge of the Lord and the imagery of being circumcised in body but not in spirit.

Paul’s use of this imagery in Jeremiah is interesting. First, it helped provide a connection between the Hebrew scriptures and the message that he was preaching. By giving his message the shine of tradition, he probably was giving it additional legitimacy.

The the existence of this Pauline imagery in Jeremiah also points out a larger point, one that I think that Christians often miss. Many of the ideas which are considered Christian actually come from the Jewish tradition that Christianity spun off of. The ideas of Jesus and Paul are not nearly as radical as they seem. The ideas that seem radical when compared against the New Testament caricatures of the Pharisees often have root in Jewish tradition. Whether it’s the idea that religious observance is pointless if the heart is not in the right place (as both Jeremiah and Isaiah express) or the idea that people should not boast about their own strengths but instead should boast about their relationship to the Lord, many seemingly Christian ideas evolved from a Jewish context. (And many of the ideas that did not evolved from Greek philosophical thought.)

New Testament

Paul describes the way that believers should shape themselves.

Psalms and Proverbs

I think we’ve done this, but it’s hard to know how preparation of fields translates into modern parlance.  In any case, I think we can start our house.

Do your planning and prepare your fields
before building your house.

bookmark_borderOct 6

Reference links:

Old Testament

Judah is evil, evil, evil. Amongst their misdeeds: rejection of the Lord, idolatry, insincere religious worship. For this they will be invaded and suffer.

New Testament

This is one of those statements which may very well have a sensible interpretation, but can be altogether too easily abused (e.g., to deny evolution or democracy).

Don’t let anyone capture you with empty philosophies and high-sounding nonsense that come from human thinking and from the spiritual powers of this world, rather than from Christ.

In context, this verse seems to be implying that people should not have their heads turned by the ideas that come from human thinking. They should not follow those ideas if they contradict what they have learned from Paul and/or Jesus. That does not mean that ideas from other humans should be rejected. Anyone who thinks about it for a minute would realize that is silly since the Bible does not even talk about all moral issues, let alone all ideas that are applicable to human well being.

Psalms and Proverbs

A good proverb:

An honest answer
is like a kiss of friendship.